‘Support not surveillance’ say NY high school students in protest

Students joined in front of the governor's office to protest $30 million in state grants funding classroom and school surveillance.

High school students protested the use of surveillance equipment in public schools outside of Gov. Andrew Como’s Manhattan office Thursday.

The group chanted  “counselors not cops” and held signs saying “support not surveillance” and “counselors not cameras,” Fox News reported.

The event aimed to draw attention to $30 million in state grants being used for the purchase of surveillance technology such as video monitoring and facial recognition software, students said.

This is not the first time that video surveillance technology in schools has created controversy. The American Civil Liberties Union called surveillance cameras ineffective and a violation of student privacy rights after 17 cameras were installed in Colorado’s Boulder High School District in 2001 following the 1999 school shooting at Columbine High School.


Last year, after Lockport City School District in New York purchased cameras and facial recognition technology for use in its schools, the ACLU urged the New York State Education Department not to allow the technology to be installed, upholding its stance against video surveillance.

“These systems infringe on the privacy rights of students, parents, and staff,” the group said.

On the other side of the argument, administrators and parents have lobbied for cameras and surveillance systems in schools, emphasizing the safety benefits the technology can provide.

In one such case, the West Virginia legislature took up a bill in February that would require schools to monitor special education classrooms with video cameras following request from parents and student advocates.

At the South by Southwest conference in Austin, Texas, earlier this month, though, ACLU senior counsel Chad Marlow encouraged school administrators to think carefully about whether the use of surveillance technology in schools provides enough safety benefit to justify the potential invasion of privacy and First Amendment rights.

Betsy Foresman

Written by Betsy Foresman

Betsy Foresman was an education reporter for EdScoop from 2018 through early 2021, where she wrote about the virtues and challenges of innovative technology solutions used in higher education and K-12 spaces. Foresman also covered local government IT for StateScoop, on occasion. Foresman graduated from Texas Christian University in 2018 — go Frogs! — with a BA in journalism and psychology. During her senior year, she worked as an intern at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C., and moved back to the capital after completing her degree because, like Shrek, she feels most at home in the swamp. Foresman previously worked at Scoop News Group as an editorial fellow.

Latest Podcasts